EBSIX vs. DYMIX
EBSIX (Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares) and DYMIX (Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional) are both Macro Trading funds. Over the past year, EBSIX returned 5.98% vs 29.27% for DYMIX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBSIX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for DYMIX.
Performance
EBSIX vs. DYMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBSIX achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly higher than DYMIX's 8.05% return.
EBSIX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- —
DYMIX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBSIX vs. DYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 9.83% | -1.14% | 11.63% | -5.87% |
DYMIX Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional | 8.05% | 25.51% | 18.38% | 11.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBSIX and DYMIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBSIX vs. DYMIX — Risk / Return Rank
EBSIX
DYMIX
EBSIX vs. DYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBSIX | DYMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 2.30 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 5.33 | -3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBSIX | DYMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.95 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 1.73 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
EBSIX vs. DYMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBSIX drawdown since its inception was -10.96%, smaller than the maximum DYMIX drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSIX and DYMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBSIX | DYMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.96% | -12.95% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -12.95% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -8.95% | +8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -3.76% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 5.59% | -2.95% |
Volatility
EBSIX vs. DYMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) is 1.99%, while Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that EBSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBSIX | DYMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 2.82% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.91% | 11.28% | -5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.08% | 15.32% | -7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 14.43% | -4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.46% | 14.43% | -4.97% |
EBSIX vs. DYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DYMIX's 1.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBSIX vs. DYMIX - Dividend Comparison
EBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than DYMIX's 6.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYMIX Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional | 6.31% | 6.82% | 7.12% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 2.88% | 3.16% | 2.90% | 1.82% | 15.10% | 7.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBSIX and DYMIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYMIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to EBSIX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBSIX dropped -10.96% vs DYMIX's -12.95%.
DYMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBSIX and DYMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer