PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYMIX vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYMIX vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYMIX achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's 5.51% return.


DYMIX

1D
-0.77%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
4.32%
6M
4.20%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVO

1D
-1.31%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
5.51%
6M
4.58%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYMIX vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DYMIX
Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional
4.32%25.51%0.50%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
5.51%20.16%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DYMIX and QDVO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYMIX vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYMIX
DYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYMIX vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DYMIXQDVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.08

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

8.08

-4.42

DYMIX vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYMIX and QDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DYMIX vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYMIX and QDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYMIXQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-17.75%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.95%

-10.21%

-2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.09%

-4.81%

-7.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-2.41%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

2.62%

+3.51%

Volatility

DYMIX vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX) is 3.55%, while Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that DYMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYMIXQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

4.47%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

9.59%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.63%

12.69%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

17.54%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

17.54%

-3.12%

DYMIX vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYMIX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

DYMIX vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

DYMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than QDVO's 10.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DYMIX
Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional
6.54%6.82%7.12%0.42%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.53%9.92%2.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYMIX and QDVO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDVO has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to DYMIX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYMIX dropped -12.95% vs QDVO's -17.75%.

QDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYMIX and QDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer