EBSIX vs. CTA
EBSIX (Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares) and CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both funds - EBSIX is a Macro Trading fund managed by Campbell & Company, while CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify. Over the past 3 years, EBSIX returned 4.42%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for CTA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBSIX charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CTA.
Performance
EBSIX vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBSIX achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 12.30% return.
EBSIX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CTA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBSIX vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 9.83% | -1.14% | 11.63% | -1.83% | 14.88% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.30% | 0.88% | 24.15% | -2.23% | 9.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBSIX and CTA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2022 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBSIX vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
EBSIX
CTA
EBSIX vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBSIX | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.42 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 3.72 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBSIX | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.78 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 0.62 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
EBSIX vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBSIX drawdown since its inception was -10.96%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSIX and CTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBSIX | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.96% | -18.07% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -11.00% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.26% | -11.23% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -7.86% | +7.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -5.67% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 4.19% | -1.55% |
Volatility
EBSIX vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) is 1.99%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that EBSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBSIX | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 7.76% | -5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.91% | 17.30% | -11.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.08% | 20.12% | -12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 16.58% | -7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.46% | 16.58% | -7.12% |
EBSIX vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBSIX vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
EBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than CTA's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 4.85% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% | 0.00% |
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 2.88% | 3.16% | 2.90% | 1.82% | 15.10% | 7.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBSIX and CTA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTA has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to EBSIX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBSIX dropped -10.96% vs CTA's -18.07%.
CTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBSIX and CTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer