EBIZ vs. PAVE
EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBIZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive E-commerce Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBIZ returned -3.65%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBIZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
EBIZ vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -15.29% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.
EBIZ
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -15.29%
- 6M
- -15.50%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
EBIZ vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | -15.29% | 17.74% | 31.26% | 30.88% | -40.96% | -13.26% | 74.39% | 32.76% | -11.01% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -12.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIZ and PAVE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between EBIZ and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EBIZ vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EBIZ
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
EBIZ
PAVE
-
Technology
EBIZ
PAVE
Industrials
EBIZ
PAVE
Real Estate
EBIZ
PAVE
-
Healthcare
EBIZ
PAVE
-
Communication Services
EBIZ
PAVE
-
Financial Services
EBIZ
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
EBIZ
-
PAVE
Consumer Defensive
EBIZ
-
PAVE
Energy
EBIZ
-
PAVE
Utilities
EBIZ
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIZ vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
EBIZ
PAVE
EBIZ vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIZ | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.34 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.13 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 11.50 | -12.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIZ | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 1.99 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.81 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.68 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
EBIZ vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIZ | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.58% | -44.08% | -17.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.73% | -11.91% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.73% | -26.23% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.21% | -26.23% | -31.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.77% | -1.82% | -23.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -6.24% | -18.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.41% | 3.24% | +10.17% |
Volatility
EBIZ vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) is 5.39%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that EBIZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIZ | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 6.42% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 15.17% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 18.84% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.90% | 21.60% | +7.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 24.38% | +4.30% |
EBIZ vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIZ vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | 0.60% | 0.51% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.84% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBIZ and PAVE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to EBIZ (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs -3.65% for EBIZ. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EBIZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIZ.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.60% for EBIZ.
EBIZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBIZ and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer