EBIZ vs. ITB
EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBIZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive E-commerce Index, while ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBIZ returned -0.64%/yr vs 6.57%/yr for ITB. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EBIZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITB.
Performance
EBIZ vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -6.79% return, which is significantly lower than ITB's -1.69% return.
EBIZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- 6M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- -3.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.46%
ITB
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $116.62K | $95.82K | $90.71K | |
| $179.18M | $195.32M | $218.82M |
EBIZ vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | -6.79% | 17.74% | 31.26% | 30.88% | -40.96% | -13.26% | 74.39% | 32.76% | -10.56% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -1.69% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIZ and ITB is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EBIZ and ITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EBIZ vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EBIZ
ITB
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
EBIZ
ITB
Technology
EBIZ
ITB
-
Communication Services
EBIZ
ITB
-
Industrials
EBIZ
ITB
Real Estate
EBIZ
ITB
Healthcare
EBIZ
ITB
-
Financial Services
EBIZ
ITB
-
Basic Materials
EBIZ
-
ITB
Consumer Defensive
EBIZ
-
ITB
-
Energy
EBIZ
-
ITB
-
Utilities
EBIZ
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIZ vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
EBIZ
ITB
EBIZ vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EBIZ | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.01 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.10 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | -0.17 | -0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EBIZ vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIZ | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.58% | -86.53% | +24.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.73% | -26.04% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.73% | -33.35% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.03% | -40.55% | -15.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.32% | -25.47% | +7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -36.98% | +12.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.76% | 14.54% | +1.22% |
Volatility
EBIZ vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) is 5.67%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that EBIZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIZ | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 8.79% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 22.03% | -5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.83% | 29.51% | -8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.95% | 29.57% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 30.20% | -1.67% |
EBIZ vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIZ vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than ITB's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.84% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.68% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBIZ and ITB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to EBIZ (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs ITB's -86.53%.
On 5-year performance, ITB leads with 6.57% vs -0.64% for EBIZ. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EBIZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ITB has performed better with a 6.57% return vs -0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIZ.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.50% for EBIZ.
EBIZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ITB is Building & Construction. EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.38% for ITB.
ITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBIZ and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer