EBIZ vs. ISHP
EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) and ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - EBIZ tracks the Solactive E-commerce Index while ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBIZ returned -3.65%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for ISHP. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBIZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISHP.
Performance
EBIZ vs. ISHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -15.29% return, which is significantly lower than ISHP's -12.76% return.
EBIZ
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -15.29%
- 6M
- -15.50%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- —
ISHP
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -12.24%
- 1Y
- -9.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- —
EBIZ vs. ISHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | -15.29% | 17.74% | 31.26% | 30.88% | -40.96% | -13.26% | 74.39% | 32.76% | -11.01% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -12.76% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIZ and ISHP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EBIZ and ISHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EBIZ vs. ISHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EBIZ
ISHP
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
EBIZ
ISHP
Technology
EBIZ
ISHP
Industrials
EBIZ
ISHP
Real Estate
EBIZ
ISHP
Healthcare
EBIZ
ISHP
Communication Services
EBIZ
ISHP
Financial Services
EBIZ
ISHP
Basic Materials
EBIZ
-
ISHP
-
Consumer Defensive
EBIZ
-
ISHP
Energy
EBIZ
-
ISHP
-
Utilities
EBIZ
-
ISHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIZ vs. ISHP — Risk / Return Rank
EBIZ
ISHP
EBIZ vs. ISHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIZ | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.92 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | -0.40 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | -0.85 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIZ | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | -0.57 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.04 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
EBIZ vs. ISHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, which is greater than ISHP's maximum drawdown of -47.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and ISHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIZ | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.58% | -47.57% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.73% | -24.75% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.73% | -24.75% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.21% | -47.57% | -10.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.77% | -19.86% | -5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -12.66% | -11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.41% | 11.46% | +1.95% |
Volatility
EBIZ vs. ISHP - Volatility Comparison
Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) at 4.32%. This indicates that EBIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIZ | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 4.32% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 13.42% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 17.23% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.90% | 27.29% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 24.10% | +4.58% |
EBIZ vs. ISHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ISHP's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIZ vs. ISHP - Dividend Comparison
EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than ISHP's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | 0.60% | 0.51% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.84% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.53% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBIZ and ISHP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EBIZ has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to ISHP (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs ISHP's -47.57%.
On 5-year performance, ISHP leads with 1.20% vs -3.65% for EBIZ. On fees, EBIZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISHP has performed better with a 1.20% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBIZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.60% for EBIZ.
EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index, while ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.60% for ISHP.
EBIZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBIZ and ISHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer