EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO
EBIT.TO (Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD) and SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EBIT.TO is passively managed, while SOLL.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, EBIT.TO returned -38.71% vs -56.21% for SOLL.TO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EBIT.TO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SOLL.TO.
Performance
EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIT.TO achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly higher than SOLL.TO's -42.41% return.
EBIT.TO
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -17.64%
- YTD
- -24.84%
- 6M
- -30.52%
- 1Y
- -38.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -4.68%
- 1M
- -14.73%
- YTD
- -42.41%
- 6M
- -50.32%
- 1Y
- -56.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD | -24.84% | 1.49% |
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -42.41% | -7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIT.TO and SOLL.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between EBIT.TO and SOLL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EBIT.TO
SOLL.TO
EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIT.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.88 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | -0.79 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.24 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIT.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | -0.78 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | -0.61 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than SOLL.TO's maximum drawdown of -71.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT.TO and SOLL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIT.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.45% | -71.52% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.63% | -71.52% | +20.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.66% | -71.52% | +22.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -34.60% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.25% | 45.19% | -15.94% |
Volatility
EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) is 9.66%, while Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a volatility of 16.48%. This indicates that EBIT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIT.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 16.48% | -6.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.02% | 50.24% | -16.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.89% | 72.62% | -29.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.64% | 71.16% | -17.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.80% | 71.16% | -16.36% |
EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIT.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLL.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIT.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither EBIT.TO nor SOLL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EBIT.TO and SOLL.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EBIT.TO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EBIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EBIT.TO and 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
Find the right allocation for EBIT.TO and SOLL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer