EBIT.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO).

EBIT.TO and CCCX-B.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EBIT.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate. It was launched on Feb 17, 2021. CCCX-B.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Aug 22, 2025.

Performance

EBIT.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EBIT.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD	-21.88%	-22.70%
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)	-26.11%	-27.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIT.TO achieves a -21.88% return, which is significantly higher than CCCX-B.TO's -26.11% return.

EBIT.TO

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: -21.88%
• 6M: -41.28%
• 1Y: -21.84%
• 3Y*: 32.34%
• 5Y*: 2.99%
• 10Y*: —

CCCX-B.TO

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: -26.11%
• 6M: -46.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIT.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIT.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX-B.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

EBIT.TO

Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD

CCCX-B.TO

CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)

Return for Risk

EBIT.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIT.TO

EBIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
EBIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EBIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
EBIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EBIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIT.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBIT.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBIT.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	-1.32	+1.39

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT.TO and CCCX-B.TO is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EBIT.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBIT.TO nor CCCX-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EBIT.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than CCCX-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT.TO and CCCX-B.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIT.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.45%	-54.49%	-20.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.63%	-52.08%	+5.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-28.87%	-3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.74%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EBIT.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.35%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.68%	49.94%	-5.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.10%	49.94%	+5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.37%	49.94%	+5.43%