EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO).
EBIT.TO and BTCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EBIT.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate. It was launched on Feb 17, 2021. BTCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021.
Performance
EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD | -21.88% | -11.88% | 134.59% | 146.50% | -62.36% | -19.03% |
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units | -23.52% | -9.18% | 116.50% | 149.22% | -65.78% | -11.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIT.TO achieves a -21.88% return, which is significantly higher than BTCC.TO's -23.52% return.
EBIT.TO
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- -21.88%
- 6M
- -41.28%
- 1Y
- -21.84%
- 3Y*
- 32.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC.TO
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- -23.52%
- 6M
- -41.91%
- 1Y
- -20.75%
- 3Y*
- 29.73%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIT.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCC.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EBIT.TO
BTCC.TO
EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIT.TO | BTCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | -0.46 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | -0.41 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.95 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | -0.44 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -0.94 | -0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIT.TO | BTCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | -0.46 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | -0.01 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.06 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIT.TO and BTCC.TO is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither EBIT.TO nor BTCC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCC.TO drawdown of -77.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT.TO and BTCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIT.TO | BTCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.45% | -77.80% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.63% | -50.04% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.45% | -77.80% | +2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.63% | -47.05% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -34.40% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.74% | 23.49% | +0.25% |
Volatility
EBIT.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) have volatilities of 12.82% and 12.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EBIT.TO | BTCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.82% | 12.86% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.35% | 36.59% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.68% | 44.86% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.10% | 56.97% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.37% | 57.43% | -2.06% |