PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD
-21.88%-11.88%134.59%146.50%-62.36%-20.03%
ETHR.TO
Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units
-28.50%-17.01%52.43%87.70%-65.64%54.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIT.TO achieves a -21.88% return, which is significantly higher than ETHR.TO's -28.50% return.


EBIT.TO

1D
1.85%
1M
5.14%
YTD
-21.88%
6M
-41.28%
1Y
-21.84%
3Y*
32.34%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*

ETHR.TO

1D
3.98%
1M
11.16%
YTD
-28.50%
6M
-50.03%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EBIT.TO and ETHR.TO have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIT.TO
EBIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHR.TO
ETHR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ETHR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBIT.TOETHR.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

0.12

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.45

0.73

-1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.08

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

0.11

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.96

0.23

-1.19

EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the ETHR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIT.TO and ETHR.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBIT.TOETHR.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

0.12

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

-0.03

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT.TO and ETHR.TO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBIT.TO nor ETHR.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHR.TO drawdown of -78.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT.TO and ETHR.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EBIT.TOETHR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.45%

-78.36%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.63%

-62.29%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.63%

-56.68%

+10.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-43.06%

+10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.74%

30.72%

-6.98%

Volatility

EBIT.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) is 12.82%, while Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO) has a volatility of 19.68%. This indicates that EBIT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EBIT.TOETHR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.82%

19.68%

-6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.35%

52.55%

-16.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.68%

74.21%

-29.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.10%

72.62%

-17.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.37%

72.62%

-17.25%