PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EATZ vs. AADR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EATZ vs. AADR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) and AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while AADR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EATZ charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for AADR.

Performance

EATZ vs. AADR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

EATZ

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

AADR

1D
-1.63%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
-5.16%
6M
-6.14%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EATZ vs. AADR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF		4.80%-6.67%23.21%25.23%-20.68%-4.90%
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF		-5.16%25.63%24.58%18.67%-22.93%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and AADR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.50

The correlation between EATZ and AADR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EATZ vs. AADR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EATZ
AADR

Consumer Cyclical

78.2%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

16.9%
2.3%

Industrials

4.9%
12.4%

Communication Services

2.3%
9.3%

Basic Materials

-

16.7%

Energy

-

8.9%

Financial Services

-

15.1%

Healthcare

-

17.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.9%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EATZ
78.2%
AADR
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

EATZ
16.9%
AADR
2.3%

Industrials

EATZ
4.9%
AADR
12.4%

Communication Services

EATZ
2.3%
AADR
9.3%

Basic Materials

EATZ

-

AADR
16.7%

Energy

EATZ

-

AADR
8.9%

Financial Services

EATZ

-

AADR
15.1%

Healthcare

EATZ

-

AADR
17.6%

Real Estate

EATZ

-

AADR

-

Technology

EATZ

-

AADR
9.9%

Utilities

EATZ

-

AADR
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF

Often compared with EATZ:
EATZ vs. IRBOEATZ vs. MOTGEATZ vs. VOOEATZ vs. RIETEATZ vs. SPYEATZ vs. VTIEATZ vs. TXRH
Often compared with AADR:
AADR vs. BRK-BAADR vs. VXUSAADR vs. VOOAADR vs. SPMOAADR vs. SPYAADR vs. CGIEAADR vs. VT

Return for Risk

EATZ vs. AADR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AADR
AADR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATZ vs. AADR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EATZAADRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

0.37

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

0.66

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.08

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

0.42

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

1.07

—

EATZ vs. AADR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EATZ vs. AADR - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EATZAADRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

—

-45.01%

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-19.30%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-20.61%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-34.80%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-45.01%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

—

-15.74%

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

—

-9.41%

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

7.56%

—

Volatility

EATZ vs. AADR - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EATZAADRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.79%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

18.21%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

21.76%

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

—

21.75%

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

—

22.14%

—

EATZ vs. AADR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AADR's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

EATZ vs. AADR - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than AADR's 0.31% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF		0.31%0.49%1.33%0.74%3.65%0.92%0.11%0.58%0.75%0.74%0.58%0.81%
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF		0.48%0.50%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EATZ and AADR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EATZ is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EATZ is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.31% for AADR.

EATZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while AADR is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for EATZ and 1.10% for AADR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EATZ and AADR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer