EATVX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
EATVX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 27, 1999. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
EATVX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EATVX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATVX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund | -0.99% | 12.86% | 14.37% | 9.44% | -9.77% | 25.92% | 4.39% | 29.73% | -5.98% | 17.65% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EATVX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EATVX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
EATVX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EATVX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EATVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EATVX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
EATVX
FASGX
EATVX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EATVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.21 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.73 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.55 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 6.89 | -2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EATVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.21 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.70 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between EATVX and FASGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EATVX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
EATVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATVX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund | 4.21% | 4.16% | 3.75% | 3.24% | 2.17% | 4.50% | 1.29% | 1.13% | 1.57% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 8.71% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
EATVX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EATVX drawdown since its inception was -53.01%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATVX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EATVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.01% | -47.35% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -9.07% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.70% | -23.54% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.63% | -27.20% | -11.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -7.95% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -6.74% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.04% | +0.82% |
Volatility
EATVX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) is 3.92%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that EATVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EATVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 4.57% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.44% | 7.78% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.48% | 12.82% | +3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 12.14% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 12.56% | +4.95% |