EAT vs. XSB.TO
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) is a stock, while XSB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF) is Short-Term Bond fund tracking the FTSE Canada Short Term Overall Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 15.24%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for XSB.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. XSB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EAT is traded in USD, while XSB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XSB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than XSB.TO's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has outperformed XSB.TO with an annualized return of 15.24%, while XSB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.99% annualized return.
EAT
- 1D
- 3.84%
- 1M
- 20.74%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- -7.70%
- 3Y*
- 65.48%
- 5Y*
- 24.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
XSB.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- -0.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.59%
- 10Y*
- 0.99%
EAT vs. XSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 14.89% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
XSB.TO iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF | -1.94% | 8.66% | -2.39% | 7.22% | -9.76% | -1.06% | 7.75% | 7.64% | -6.28% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and XSB.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2006 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. XSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
XSB.TO
EAT vs. XSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAT | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.00 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 0.00 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 0.01 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAT vs. XSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than XSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and XSB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -28.27% | -60.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -3.82% | -40.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -7.05% | -38.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.54% | -16.64% | -48.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | -18.49% | -66.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.82% | -9.49% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -11.09% | -13.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.85% | 1.49% | +20.36% |
Volatility
EAT vs. XSB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 12.45% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) at 1.22%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.45% | 1.22% | +11.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.42% | 3.70% | +32.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.11% | 4.72% | +42.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.03% | 6.83% | +42.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.16% | 7.24% | +47.92% |
Dividends
EAT vs. XSB.TO - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
XSB.TO iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF | 3.10% | 3.15% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 2.28% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.39% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.36% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and XSB.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EAT and XSB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer