EAT vs. UCBJY
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and UCBJY (UCB SA ADR) are both stocks. EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while UCBJY operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 13.68%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for UCBJY. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. UCBJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than UCBJY's 8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed UCBJY with an annualized return of 13.68%, while UCBJY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.
EAT
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- -14.86%
- 3Y*
- 59.52%
- 5Y*
- 18.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
UCBJY
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 63.21%
- 3Y*
- 49.75%
- 5Y*
- 26.47%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
EAT vs. UCBJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 1.83% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
UCBJY UCB SA ADR | 8.13% | 42.69% | 129.19% | 12.67% | -30.04% | 6.90% | 34.46% | -1.59% | 9.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and UCBJY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2009 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
EAT:
$6.50B
UCBJY:
$58.31B
EAT:
$10.14
UCBJY:
$6.73
EAT:
14.41
UCBJY:
22.30
EAT:
0.33
UCBJY:
0.50
EAT:
1.16
UCBJY:
4.21
EAT:
16.02
UCBJY:
5.37
EAT:
$5.73B
UCBJY:
$13.86B
EAT:
$3.45B
UCBJY:
$10.00B
EAT:
$807.20M
UCBJY:
$4.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. UCBJY — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
UCBJY
EAT vs. UCBJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and UCB SA ADR (UCBJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAT | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 2.92 | -3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 7.25 | -7.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAT | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 1.83 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.88 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.54 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.57 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
EAT vs. UCBJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than UCBJY's maximum drawdown of -50.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and UCBJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -50.32% | -38.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -21.77% | -22.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -28.58% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.54% | -46.82% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | -50.32% | -34.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.73% | -10.15% | -12.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -13.15% | -11.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.68% | 8.75% | +12.93% |
Volatility
EAT vs. UCBJY - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 16.59% compared to UCB SA ADR (UCBJY) at 7.48%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCBJY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.59% | 7.48% | +9.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.50% | 23.81% | +11.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.55% | 34.79% | +11.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.95% | 30.19% | +18.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.09% | 30.62% | +24.47% |
Dividends
EAT vs. UCBJY - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UCBJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
UCBJY UCB SA ADR | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.73% | 1.67% | 1.79% | 0.86% | 0.78% | 1.06% | 1.10% | 2.71% | 3.21% | 0.00% |
Financials
EAT vs. UCBJY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and UCB SA ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EAT vs. UCBJY - Profitability Comparison
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
UCBJY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a gross profit of 3.04B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
UCBJY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UCB SA ADR reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
UCBJY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a net income of 1.07B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 25.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and UCBJY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAT has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to UCBJY (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs UCBJY's -50.32%.
UCBJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAT and UCBJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer