EAT vs. SMCI

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and SMCI (Super Micro Computer, Inc.) are both stocks. EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while SMCI operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 13.68%/yr vs 32.81%/yr for SMCI. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EAT vs. SMCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than SMCI's 50.29% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed SMCI with an annualized return of 13.68%, while SMCI has yielded a comparatively higher 32.81% annualized return.

EAT

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: -14.86%
• 3Y*: 59.52%
• 5Y*: 18.17%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

SMCI

• 1D: 5.64%
• 1M: 24.37%
• YTD: 50.29%
• 6M: 24.37%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 18.91%
• 5Y*: 64.69%
• 10Y*: 32.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAT vs. SMCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	1.83%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-35.32%	36.16%	-0.92%	17.27%	-18.44%
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc.	50.29%	-3.97%	7.23%	246.24%	86.80%	38.82%	31.81%	74.06%	-34.07%	-25.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EAT and SMCI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2007	0.25

The correlation between EAT and SMCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap EAT : $6.50B SMCI : $29.63B
EPS EAT : $10.14 SMCI : $2.70
PE Ratio EAT : 14.41 SMCI : 16.27
PEG Ratio EAT : 0.33 SMCI : 0.36
PS Ratio EAT : 1.16 SMCI : 0.86
PB Ratio EAT : 16.02 SMCI : 3.91
Total Revenue (TTM) EAT : $5.73B SMCI : $33.70B
Gross Profit (TTM) EAT : $3.45B SMCI : $2.83B
EBITDA (TTM) EAT : $807.20M SMCI : $1.47B

Return for Risk

EAT vs. SMCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 29
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SMCI

SMCI Risk / Return Rank: 46
SMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAT vs. SMCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAT	SMCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	0.07	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	0.68	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.09	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	0.09	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	0.15	-0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAT vs. SMCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the SMCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and SMCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAT	SMCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32	0.07	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.76	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.47	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.36	-0.08

Drawdowns

EAT vs. SMCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, roughly equal to the maximum SMCI drawdown of -84.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and SMCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAT	SMCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.40%	-84.84%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.41%	-66.18%	+21.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.92%	-84.84%	+38.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.54%	-84.84%	+19.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.94%	-84.84%	-0.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.73%	-62.97%	+40.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.34%	-31.96%	+7.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.68%	38.91%	-17.23%

Volatility

EAT vs. SMCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is 16.59%, while Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) has a volatility of 26.36%. This indicates that EAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAT	SMCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.59%	26.36%	-9.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.50%	67.65%	-32.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.55%	79.63%	-33.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.95%	85.44%	-36.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.09%	70.55%	-15.46%

Dividends

EAT vs. SMCI - Dividend Comparison

Neither EAT nor SMCI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

EAT vs. SMCI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brinker International, Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

SMCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 10.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

SMCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported an operating income of 625.87M and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

SMCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAT and SMCI in my portfolio?

EAT and SMCI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAT or SMCI?

SMCI has higher volatility (26.36%) compared to EAT (16.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs SMCI's -84.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.