EAT vs. MSFT
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 14.68%/yr vs 24.39%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 14.68%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.39% annualized return.
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 16.50%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
EAT vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and MSFT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1989 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EAT and MSFT has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
EAT:
$7.09B
MSFT:
$2.91T
EAT:
$10.14
MSFT:
$16.79
EAT:
15.71
MSFT:
23.27
EAT:
0.36
MSFT:
1.63
EAT:
1.27
MSFT:
9.16
EAT:
17.46
MSFT:
7.02
EAT:
$5.73B
MSFT:
$318.27B
EAT:
$3.45B
MSFT:
$217.41B
EAT:
$807.20M
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
MSFT
EAT vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAT | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | -0.53 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | -1.08 | +0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAT vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -69.38% | -19.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -33.91% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -33.91% | -12.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.54% | -37.15% | -28.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | -37.15% | -47.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -27.46% | +11.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -21.78% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.77% | 16.48% | +5.29% |
Volatility
EAT vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.52%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.23% | 10.52% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.27% | 22.31% | +13.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.95% | 25.42% | +21.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 26.66% | +22.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.13% | 27.06% | +28.07% |
Dividends
EAT vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
EAT vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EAT vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and MSFT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAT has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
EAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAT and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer