EAT vs. IBKR
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and IBKR (Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.) are both stocks. EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while IBKR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 14.68%/yr vs 26.54%/yr for IBKR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 41.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed IBKR with an annualized return of 14.68%, while IBKR has yielded a comparatively higher 26.54% annualized return.
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
IBKR
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 41.50%
- 6M
- 41.85%
- 1Y
- 80.51%
- 3Y*
- 67.33%
- 5Y*
- 41.64%
- 10Y*
- 26.54%
EAT vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 41.50% | 46.37% | 114.43% | 15.14% | -8.35% | 31.12% | 31.71% | -14.01% | -7.13% | 63.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and IBKR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007 | 0.32 |
The correlation between EAT and IBKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EAT:
$7.09B
IBKR:
$40.72B
EAT:
$10.14
IBKR:
$3.76
EAT:
15.71
IBKR:
24.18
EAT:
0.36
IBKR:
0.83
EAT:
1.27
IBKR:
4.66
EAT:
17.46
IBKR:
1.92
EAT:
$5.73B
IBKR:
$8.69B
EAT:
$3.45B
IBKR:
$7.75B
EAT:
$807.20M
IBKR:
$7.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
IBKR
EAT vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAT | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 4.20 | -4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 10.65 | -11.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAT vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and IBKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -63.66% | -24.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -18.70% | -25.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -38.66% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.54% | -38.66% | -26.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | -55.09% | -29.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | 0.00% | -15.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -24.85% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.77% | 7.35% | +14.42% |
Volatility
EAT vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 11.31%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.23% | 11.31% | +3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.27% | 27.82% | +8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.95% | 37.67% | +9.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 34.50% | +14.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.13% | 33.37% | +21.76% |
Dividends
EAT vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.68% | 1.10% | 0.92% |
Financials
EAT vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and IBKR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAT has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to IBKR (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs IBKR's -63.66%.
IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAT and IBKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer