EAT vs. HACBY
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and HACBY (Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR) are both stocks. EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while HACBY operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 16.54%/yr vs -3.05%/yr for HACBY. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. HACBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EAT having a 35.88% return and HACBY slightly higher at 37.17%. Over the past 10 years, EAT has outperformed HACBY with an annualized return of 16.54%, while HACBY has yielded a comparatively lower -3.05% annualized return.
EAT
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 18.27%
- 6M
- 23.67%
- YTD
- 35.88%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 71.02%
- 5Y*
- 26.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.23%
HACBY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 37.17%
- YTD
- 37.17%
- 1Y
- 106.79%
- 3Y*
- -9.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- -3.05%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.49%
EAT vs. HACBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 35.88% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
HACBY Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR | 37.17% | 91.80% | -77.26% | 32.97% | 24.57% | -3.28% | -22.69% | 7.06% | -29.46% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and HACBY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
EAT:
$8.36B
HACBY:
$5.47B
EAT:
$10.20
HACBY:
¥284.46
EAT:
19.11
HACBY:
17.29
EAT:
0.44
HACBY:
0.55
EAT:
1.54
HACBY:
3.74
EAT:
21.37
HACBY:
0.97
EAT:
$5.73B
HACBY:
¥299.73B
EAT:
$3.45B
HACBY:
¥244.80B
EAT:
$807.20M
HACBY:
¥80.85B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. HACBY — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
HACBY
EAT vs. HACBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR (HACBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAT | HACBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 2.63 | -1.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 6.91 | -6.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 21.73 | -20.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAT vs. HACBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, roughly equal to the maximum HACBY drawdown of -85.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and HACBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | HACBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -85.63% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.34% | -15.53% | -22.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -85.52% | +39.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.24% | -85.52% | +22.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | -85.63% | +0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -56.92% | +56.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.29% | -41.21% | +16.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.63% | 4.93% | +10.70% |
Volatility
EAT vs. HACBY - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR (HACBY) have volatilities of 10.22% and 10.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | HACBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 10.62% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.26% | 21.74% | +14.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.69% | 51.05% | -3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.87% | 64.48% | -15.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.26% | 52.67% | +2.59% |
Dividends
EAT vs. HACBY - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
HACBY Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR | 0.85% | 2.95% | 7.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 2.44% | 0.00% |
Financials
EAT vs. HACBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EAT vs. HACBY - Profitability Comparison
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
HACBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 83.20B and revenue of 97.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
HACBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 12.70B and revenue of 97.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
HACBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported a net income of 17.17B and revenue of 97.90B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and HACBY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HACBY has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to EAT (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs HACBY's -85.63%.
HACBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAT and HACBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer