PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAT vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EAT vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 14.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 13.45%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively higher 25.69% annualized return.


EAT

1D
1.49%
1M
0.06%
YTD
-2.27%
6M
-1.27%
1Y
-19.09%
3Y*
52.02%
5Y*
19.93%
10Y*
13.45%

GOOGL

1D
-0.79%
1M
-6.33%
YTD
14.77%
6M
12.47%
1Y
116.77%
3Y*
42.66%
5Y*
24.78%
10Y*
25.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAT vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
-2.27%8.49%206.37%35.32%-12.79%-35.32%36.16%-0.92%17.27%-18.44%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
14.77%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EAT and GOOGL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2004

0.28

The correlation between EAT and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EAT:

$6.24B

GOOGL:

$4.39T

EPS

EAT:

$10.14

GOOGL:

$13.11

PE Ratio

EAT:

13.83

GOOGL:

27.37

PEG Ratio

EAT:

0.32

GOOGL:

1.35

PS Ratio

EAT:

1.12

GOOGL:

10.38

PB Ratio

EAT:

15.37

GOOGL:

9.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

EAT:

$5.73B

GOOGL:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EAT:

$3.45B

GOOGL:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

EAT:

$807.20M

GOOGL:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAT vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAT
EAT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAT vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EATGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.65

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

5.77

-6.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

21.31

-22.20

EAT vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EATGOOGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

4.03

-4.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.80

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.89

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.84

-0.56

Drawdowns

EAT vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EATGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.40%

-65.29%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.41%

-20.37%

-24.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.92%

-29.81%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.73%

-44.32%

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.94%

-44.32%

-40.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.84%

-10.84%

-15.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-13.02%

-11.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.52%

5.50%

+16.02%

Volatility

EAT vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 16.02% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 8.29%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EATGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.02%

8.29%

+7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.41%

20.56%

+14.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.21%

29.22%

+16.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.06%

31.29%

+17.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.07%

29.10%

+25.97%

Dividends

EAT vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%3.62%3.46%3.71%2.67%2.50%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.23%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EAT vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
1.47B
109.90B
(EAT) Total Revenue
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EAT vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brinker International, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
74.6%
62.5%
Portfolio components
EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EAT and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAT has higher volatility (16.02%) compared to GOOGL (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs GOOGL's -65.29%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAT and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer