EAT vs. GDE
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) is a stock, while GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) is Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 3 years, EAT returned 52.33%/yr vs 47.08%/yr for GDE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. GDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 11.25% return.
EAT
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- -21.33%
- 3Y*
- 52.33%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
GDE
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 54.50%
- 3Y*
- 47.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAT vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | -4.89% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -9.94% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 11.25% | 73.76% | 44.79% | 33.85% | -18.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and GDE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.27 |
The correlation between EAT and GDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
GDE
EAT vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.42 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 7.50 | -8.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | 1.93 | -2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.17 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
EAT vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and GDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -32.01% | -56.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -22.66% | -21.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -22.66% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.83% | -9.99% | -17.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -7.89% | -16.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.59% | 7.29% | +14.30% |
Volatility
EAT vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 6.68%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.84% | 6.68% | +9.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.47% | 24.27% | +11.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.26% | 28.41% | +17.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.08% | 26.12% | +22.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.07% | 26.12% | +28.95% |
Dividends
EAT vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 3.88% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and GDE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAT has higher volatility (15.84%) compared to GDE (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs GDE's -32.01%.
GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAT and GDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer