EAT vs. BTCC.TO

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) is a stock, while BTCC.TO (Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Over the past 5 years, EAT returned 24.33%/yr vs 5.64%/yr for BTCC.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EAT vs. BTCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EAT is traded in USD, while BTCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BTCC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than BTCC.TO's -31.72% return.

EAT

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: 20.74%
• YTD: 14.89%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: -7.70%
• 3Y*: 65.48%
• 5Y*: 24.33%
• 10Y*: 15.24%

BTCC.TO

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -21.42%
• YTD: -31.72%
• 6M: -31.57%
• 1Y: -43.20%
• 3Y*: 23.87%
• 5Y*: 5.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAT vs. BTCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	14.89%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-49.81%
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units	-31.72%	-4.84%	99.60%	155.29%	-67.82%	-15.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EAT and BTCC.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021	0.19

The correlation between EAT and BTCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EAT vs. BTCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BTCC.TO

BTCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAT vs. BTCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAT	BTCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	-0.99	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	-1.45	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.84	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	-0.83	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	-1.43	+1.09

EAT vs. BTCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and BTCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAT vs. BTCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than BTCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -79.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and BTCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAT	BTCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.40%	-79.35%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.41%	-52.97%	+8.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.92%	-52.97%	+7.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.54%	-79.35%	+13.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.82%	-51.79%	+38.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.33%	-36.75%	+12.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.85%	30.54%	-8.69%

Volatility

EAT vs. BTCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is 12.45%, while Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) has a volatility of 13.30%. This indicates that EAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAT	BTCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.45%	13.30%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.42%	34.50%	+1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.11%	44.02%	+3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.03%	55.49%	-6.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.16%	56.68%	-1.52%

Dividends

EAT vs. BTCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither EAT nor BTCC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAT and BTCC.TO in my portfolio?

EAT and BTCC.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.