EASG vs. DGP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and DGP (DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes) are both exchange-traded funds - EASG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while DGP is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EASG returned 7.13%/yr vs 31.51%/yr for DGP. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EASG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DGP.

Performance

EASG vs. DGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly higher than DGP's 2.76% return.

EASG

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 8.96%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 18.95%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: —

DGP

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -5.70%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 58.15%
• 3Y*: 58.75%
• 5Y*: 31.51%
• 10Y*: 20.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASG vs. DGP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	8.96%	25.19%	2.26%	18.80%	-16.94%	11.36%	10.73%	23.66%	-5.41%
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes	2.76%	141.40%	53.16%	16.97%	-5.54%	-11.29%	45.29%	32.27%	6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and DGP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018	0.21

The correlation between EASG and DGP shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EASG vs. DGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 35
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 40

DGP

DGP Risk / Return Rank: 32
DGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DGP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
DGP Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASG vs. DGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EASG	DGP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.11	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	1.61	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.23	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	1.81	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.39	4.69	+1.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EASG vs. DGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the DGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and DGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EASG	DGP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	1.11	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.82	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.28	+0.23

Drawdowns

EASG vs. DGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum DGP drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and DGP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EASG	DGP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.06%	-75.31%	+43.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-36.58%	+24.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.14%	-36.58%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.42%	-51.24%	+19.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-31.62%	+31.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-41.10%	+34.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	14.09%	-10.92%

Volatility

EASG vs. DGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 5.03%, while DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a volatility of 11.05%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EASG	DGP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	11.05%	-6.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	46.32%	-33.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.57%	52.65%	-37.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.64%	38.80%	-22.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	35.04%	-16.69%

EASG vs. DGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DGP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EASG vs. DGP - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.84%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASG and DGP in my portfolio?

EASG and DGP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EASG or DGP?

DGP has higher volatility (11.05%) compared to EASG (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs DGP's -75.31%.

Which ETF is better, EASG or DGP?

On 5-year performance, DGP leads with 31.51% vs 7.13% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EASG has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EASG or DGP?

Over the 5-year period, DGP has performed better with a 31.51% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EASG or DGP?

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EASG or DGP?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for DGP.

What is the main difference between EASG and DGP?

EASG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DGP is Leveraged Commodities. EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.75% for DGP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EASG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.