EART vs. WOOD
EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) and WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EART is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while WOOD is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EART returned 19.97%/yr vs -0.01%/yr for WOOD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EART charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for WOOD.
Performance
EART vs. WOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than WOOD's -7.28% return.
EART
- 1D
- -5.19%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 90.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WOOD
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- -7.28%
- 6M
- -6.36%
- 1Y
- -6.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.97%
EART vs. WOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 8.19% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -17.92% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | -7.28% | -3.27% | -4.21% | 13.84% | -15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EART and WOOD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.60 |
The correlation between EART and WOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EART vs. WOOD — Risk / Return Rank
EART
WOOD
EART vs. WOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EART | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.96 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | -0.31 | +3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | -0.67 | +10.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EART vs. WOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, smaller than the maximum WOOD drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and WOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EART | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -63.25% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -21.64% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.20% | -22.79% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -24.58% | +6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.98% | -14.79% | -14.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 10.14% | -1.16% |
Volatility
EART vs. WOOD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) has a higher volatility of 13.28% compared to iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) at 5.12%. This indicates that EART's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EART | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.28% | 5.12% | +8.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 14.22% | +19.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.51% | 18.90% | +20.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 19.74% | +14.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 21.76% | +12.50% |
EART vs. WOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than WOOD's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
EART vs. WOOD - Dividend Comparison
EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than WOOD's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | 2.55% | 2.51% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 1.24% | 0.98% | 1.85% | 2.82% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EART and WOOD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EART has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to WOOD (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EART dropped -53.68% vs WOOD's -63.25%.
On 3-year performance, EART leads with 19.97% vs -0.01% for WOOD. On fees, WOOD is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 19.97% return vs -0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WOOD is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EART.
WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.60% for EART.
EART is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while WOOD is Materials. EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EART and 0.46% for WOOD.
EART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EART and WOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer