EART vs. WOOD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD).
EART and WOOD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EART is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. It was launched on Jan 24, 2022. WOOD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both EART and WOOD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EART vs. WOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EART vs. WOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 7.49% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -16.33% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | -1.47% | -3.27% | -4.21% | 13.84% | -14.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than WOOD's -1.47% return.
EART
- 1D
- 4.60%
- 1M
- -18.58%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 23.42%
- 1Y
- 108.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WOOD
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -9.48%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -1.91%
- 1Y
- -3.55%
- 3Y*
- 1.84%
- 5Y*
- -2.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EART vs. WOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than WOOD's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EART vs. WOOD — Risk / Return Rank
EART
WOOD
EART vs. WOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EART | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.76 | -0.17 | +2.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | -0.10 | +3.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.99 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | -0.22 | +4.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.28 | -0.64 | +14.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EART | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | -0.17 | +2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.17 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between EART and WOOD is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EART vs. WOOD - Dividend Comparison
EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than WOOD's 2.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 1.24% | 0.98% | 1.85% | 2.82% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
EART vs. WOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, smaller than the maximum WOOD drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and WOOD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EART | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -63.25% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -18.91% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.58% | -19.85% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -14.69% | -15.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.89% | 6.52% | +0.37% |
Volatility
EART vs. WOOD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) at 7.12%. This indicates that EART's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EART | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.00% | 7.12% | +9.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.26% | 13.33% | +18.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.95% | 20.93% | +19.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.89% | 19.68% | +14.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.89% | 21.84% | +12.05% |