EART vs. RSPM
EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) and RSPM (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EART is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while RSPM is a Materials fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EART returned 14.34%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for RSPM. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EART charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPM.
Performance
EART vs. RSPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than RSPM's 15.29% return.
EART
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- 6M
- -13.83%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- 52.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.99%
RSPM
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $439.93K | $546.94K | $580.35K | |
| $1.60M | $1.26M | $779.50K |
EART vs. RSPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | -1.67% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -17.92% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 15.29% | 6.90% | -1.30% | 8.32% | -4.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EART and RSPM is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between EART and RSPM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EART vs. RSPM — Risk / Return Rank
EART
RSPM
EART vs. RSPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EART | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.81 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 5.41 | -1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EART vs. RSPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, smaller than the maximum RSPM drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and RSPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EART | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -61.18% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.83% | -12.32% | -17.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.15% | -27.19% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.51% | -4.53% | -20.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -8.76% | -20.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.12% | 4.12% | +8.00% |
Volatility
EART vs. RSPM - Volatility Comparison
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) at 5.87%. This indicates that EART's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EART | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.78% | 5.87% | +4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.17% | 14.48% | +18.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.21% | 18.80% | +21.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 20.24% | +14.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 21.90% | +12.36% |
EART vs. RSPM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EART vs. RSPM - Dividend Comparison
EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than RSPM's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.77% | 2.06% | 2.04% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EART and RSPM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EART has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to RSPM (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EART dropped -53.68% vs RSPM's -61.18%.
On 3-year performance, EART leads with 14.34% vs 6.92% for RSPM. On fees, RSPM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPM has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 14.34% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EART.
RSPM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.69% for EART.
EART is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while RSPM is Materials. EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while RSPM tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EART and 0.40% for RSPM.
EART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EART and RSPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer