EART vs. QYLD
EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EART is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EART returned 14.34%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for QYLD. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EART charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
EART vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.67% return.
EART
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- 6M
- -13.83%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- 52.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.99%
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $439.93K | $546.94K | $580.35K | |
| $83.30M | $78.68M | $98.28M |
EART vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | -1.67% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -17.92% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.67% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -11.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between EART and QYLD is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.46 |
The correlation between EART and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EART vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
EART
QYLD
EART vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EART | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.38 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 15.70 | -11.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EART vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EART | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -24.75% | -28.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.83% | -5.78% | -24.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.15% | -19.06% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.51% | -2.96% | -22.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -3.81% | -25.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.12% | 1.24% | +10.88% |
Volatility
EART vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 5.19%. This indicates that EART's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EART | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.78% | 5.19% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.17% | 10.04% | +23.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.21% | 11.26% | +28.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 15.04% | +19.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 15.63% | +18.63% |
EART vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EART vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than QYLD's 11.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.89% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EART and QYLD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EART has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to QYLD (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EART dropped -53.68% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 3-year performance, EART leads with 14.34% vs 12.32% for QYLD. On fees, EART is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 14.34% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EART is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 0.69% for EART.
EART is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EART and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EART and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer