PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EART vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EART vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EART vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
7.49%98.48%-7.19%-19.75%-16.33%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
6.32%19.36%17.92%31.01%3.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than PAVE's 6.32% return.


EART

1D
4.60%
1M
-18.58%
YTD
7.49%
6M
23.42%
1Y
108.62%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
10Y*

PAVE

1D
3.29%
1M
-7.77%
YTD
6.32%
6M
7.40%
1Y
35.92%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EART vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EART vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EART
EART Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EART Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EART vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EARTPAVEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.76

1.61

+1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.00

2.30

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

2.90

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.28

10.73

+3.56

EART vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EART Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EART and PAVE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EARTPAVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

1.61

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.63

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between EART and PAVE is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EART vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than PAVE's 0.86% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
0.60%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.86%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Drawdowns

EART vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and PAVE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EARTPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.68%

-44.08%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.03%

-12.56%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.58%

-8.70%

-9.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-6.30%

-23.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

3.39%

+3.50%

Volatility

EART vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 7.74%. This indicates that EART's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EARTPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.00%

7.74%

+9.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.26%

13.97%

+18.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.95%

22.40%

+17.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.89%

21.42%

+12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

24.41%

+9.48%