EART vs. FMTL
EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) and FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) are both Rare Earth & Strategic Metals funds - EART tracks the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index while FMTL tracks the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EART charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FMTL.
Performance
EART vs. FMTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than FMTL's 16.73% return.
EART
- 1D
- -5.19%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 90.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMTL
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- 16.73%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EART vs. FMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 8.19% | 22.67% |
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 16.73% | 21.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EART and FMTL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EART vs. FMTL — Risk / Return Rank
EART
FMTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EART vs. FMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EART | FMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EART vs. FMTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, which is greater than FMTL's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and FMTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EART | FMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -22.44% | -31.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -12.48% | -5.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.98% | -5.34% | -23.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | — | — |
Volatility
EART vs. FMTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EART | FMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.51% | 40.43% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 40.43% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 40.43% | -6.17% |
EART vs. FMTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EART vs. FMTL - Dividend Comparison
EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than FMTL's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% |
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EART and FMTL have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EART is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EART is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.
EART has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.05% for FMTL.
EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EART and 0.65% for FMTL.
Find the right allocation for EART and FMTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer