PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EART vs. FMTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EART vs. FMTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than FMTL's 13.02% return.


EART

1D
-0.20%
1M
-5.56%
6M
-13.83%
YTD
-1.67%
1Y
52.96%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.99%

FMTL

1D
-1.16%
1M
-0.42%
6M
-3.15%
YTD
13.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$439.93K$546.94K$580.35K
$120.74K$163.81K$239.35K

EART vs. FMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EART and FMTL is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EART vs. FMTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EART
EART Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EART Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EART vs. FMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EARTFMTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

EART vs. FMTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EART vs. FMTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, which is greater than FMTL's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and FMTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EARTFMTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.68%

-22.44%

-31.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.51%

-15.26%

-10.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.88%

-6.98%

-21.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.12%

Volatility

EART vs. FMTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EARTFMTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.21%

39.57%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.26%

39.57%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.26%

39.57%

-5.31%

EART vs. FMTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EART vs. FMTL - Dividend Comparison

EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FMTL's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
0.69%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%
FMTL
First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF
1.64%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EART and FMTL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EART is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EART is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.

FMTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.69% for EART.

EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EART and 0.65% for FMTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EART and FMTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer