EAOR vs. AOM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) and AOM (iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares - EAOR tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index while AOM tracks the S&P Target Risk Moderate. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOR returned 6.41%/yr vs 4.80%/yr for AOM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EAOR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AOM.

Performance

EAOR vs. AOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's 5.00% return.

EAOR

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 6M: 7.84%
• 1Y: 19.56%
• 3Y*: 13.83%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: —

AOM

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.13%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 14.51%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 4.80%
• 10Y*: 6.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. AOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	7.50%	15.59%	10.69%	14.96%	-16.66%	10.51%	15.00%
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	5.00%	13.28%	7.95%	12.38%	-14.54%	6.93%	9.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and AOM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020	0.95

The correlation between EAOR and AOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOR vs. AOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAOR	AOM
Technology	22.3%	27.9%
Financial Services	10.3%	16.1%
Industrials	6.8%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	9.5%
Communication Services	5.6%	8.1%
Healthcare	5.2%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	5.0%
Energy	2.3%	4.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.2%
Utilities	1.7%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.2%	2.4%

Return for Risk

EAOR vs. AOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR

EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 69
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

AOM

AOM Risk / Return Rank: 65
AOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AOM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
AOM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOR	AOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.23	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	3.22	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.42	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	2.85	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	12.45	+0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAOR vs. AOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the AOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and AOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOR	AOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.23	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.59	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.69	+0.18

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and AOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOR	AOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.91%	-19.96%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.62%	-5.11%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.28%	-6.85%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	-19.96%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.46%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-2.70%	-2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	1.17%	+0.33%

Volatility

EAOR vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) at 2.17%. This indicates that EAOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAOR	AOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	2.17%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.90%	5.22%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.55%	6.55%	+2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.52%	8.14%	+2.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.39%	7.93%	+2.46%

EAOR vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EAOR vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than AOM's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	2.98%	2.98%	3.10%	2.79%	2.27%	1.56%	2.02%	2.66%	2.53%	3.31%	2.14%	1.98%
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	2.34%	2.45%	2.52%	2.39%	1.99%	1.39%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAOR and AOM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, EAOR and AOM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EAOR or AOM?

EAOR has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to AOM (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs AOM's -19.96%.

Which ETF is better, EAOR or AOM?

On 5-year performance, EAOR leads with 6.41% vs 4.80% for AOM. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AOM has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAOR or AOM?

Over the 5-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 6.41% return vs 4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAOR or AOM?

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAOR or AOM?

AOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 2.34% for EAOR.

What is the main difference between EAOR and AOM?

EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while AOM tracks S&P Target Risk Moderate. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 0.25% for AOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.