PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EAOR vs. XCSR.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and XCSR.TO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

EAOR vs. XCSR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
37.98%
75.63%
EAOR
XCSR.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EAOR:

1.37

XCSR.TO:

2.64

Sortino Ratio

EAOR:

1.95

XCSR.TO:

3.52

Omega Ratio

EAOR:

1.24

XCSR.TO:

1.48

Calmar Ratio

EAOR:

2.33

XCSR.TO:

4.68

Martin Ratio

EAOR:

7.18

XCSR.TO:

15.40

Ulcer Index

EAOR:

1.55%

XCSR.TO:

1.82%

Daily Std Dev

EAOR:

8.15%

XCSR.TO:

10.62%

Max Drawdown

EAOR:

-22.91%

XCSR.TO:

-23.57%

Current Drawdown

EAOR:

-0.93%

XCSR.TO:

-0.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than XCSR.TO's 4.51% return.


EAOR

YTD

2.39%

1M

-0.13%

6M

2.57%

1Y

10.14%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XCSR.TO

YTD

4.51%

1M

-0.55%

6M

14.67%

1Y

26.50%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAOR vs. XCSR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XCSR.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
Expense ratio chart for EAOR: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%
Expense ratio chart for XCSR.TO: current value at 0.17% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.17%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EAOR vs. XCSR.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAOR is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAOR is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAOR is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAOR is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAOR is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAOR is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XCSR.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XCSR.TO is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XCSR.TO is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XCSR.TO is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XCSR.TO is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XCSR.TO is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XCSR.TO is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EAOR vs. XCSR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EAOR, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.251.40
The chart of Sortino ratio for EAOR, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.781.90
The chart of Omega ratio for EAOR, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.231.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for EAOR, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.111.49
The chart of Martin ratio for EAOR, currently valued at 6.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.456.83
EAOR
XCSR.TO

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and XCSR.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.25
1.40
EAOR
XCSR.TO

Dividends

EAOR vs. XCSR.TO - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than XCSR.TO's 2.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.46%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF
2.11%2.20%2.61%2.76%1.54%0.81%

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. XCSR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, roughly equal to the maximum XCSR.TO drawdown of -23.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and XCSR.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.93%
-2.81%
EAOR
XCSR.TO

Volatility

EAOR vs. XCSR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) is 2.29%, while iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that EAOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCSR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.29%
4.17%
EAOR
XCSR.TO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab