EAOM vs. PTIN
EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) and PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - EAOM tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index while PTIN tracks the Pacer Trendpilot International Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOM returned 4.13%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for PTIN. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EAOM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PTIN.
Performance
EAOM vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 18.60% return.
EAOM
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 11.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.93%
PTIN
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- YTD
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 33.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $32.37K | $91.04K | $54.92K | |
| $434.65K | $363.43K | $473.04K |
EAOM vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 5.95% | 12.90% | 7.29% | 11.83% | -15.48% | 6.39% | 10.30% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 18.60% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 12.26% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOM and PTIN is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EAOM and PTIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOM vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank
EAOM
PTIN
EAOM vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAOM | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.88 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.54 | 10.59 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAOM vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, roughly equal to the maximum PTIN drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and PTIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOM | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -21.27% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | -11.55% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.06% | -13.93% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.73% | -21.27% | +0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.12% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -7.55% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 3.13% | -1.90% |
Volatility
EAOM vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 2.15%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOM | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.15% | 4.96% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.95% | 15.78% | -9.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.00% | 17.69% | -10.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 14.75% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.92% | 14.12% | -6.20% |
EAOM vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOM vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison
EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than PTIN's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.84% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.14% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOM and PTIN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIN has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to EAOM (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOM dropped -20.73% vs PTIN's -21.27%.
On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.92% vs 4.13% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOM has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.92% return vs 4.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.
EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.14% for PTIN.
EAOM tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index, while PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOM and PTIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer