PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOM vs. CEFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EAOM vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EAOM vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
-0.98%12.90%7.29%11.83%-15.48%6.39%10.30%
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
-0.33%16.67%23.48%20.99%-7.08%17.86%15.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's -0.33% return.


EAOM

1D
1.38%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
0.86%
1Y
10.87%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*

CEFS

1D
2.04%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
3.31%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAOM vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EAOM vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CEFS
CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOMCEFSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.11

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.54

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.43

+0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.22

6.94

+1.27

EAOM vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOM and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOMCEFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.11

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.90

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.70

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and CEFS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EAOM vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than CEFS's 8.01% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.92%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
8.01%7.84%8.79%9.20%11.32%10.73%8.61%8.10%10.43%5.02%

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and CEFS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOMCEFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-38.99%

+18.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-9.80%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

-16.85%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.67%

-3.75%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-3.73%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

2.02%

-0.68%

Volatility

EAOM vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 3.32%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EAOMCEFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

4.75%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.81%

7.46%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

13.15%

-5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.02%

12.99%

-4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.91%

15.38%

-7.47%