EAOA vs. NTSX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX).
EAOA and NTSX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EAOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. NTSX is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 2, 2018.
Performance
EAOA vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EAOA vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | -1.25% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | -4.22% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 20.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's -4.22% return.
EAOA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 16.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAOA vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EAOA vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank
EAOA
NTSX
EAOA vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOA | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 0.89 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 1.30 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.52 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 6.52 | +1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOA | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 0.89 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.48 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.62 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOA and NTSX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EAOA vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison
EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than NTSX's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.12% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.22% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
EAOA vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and NTSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOA | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.06% | -31.34% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -11.13% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -31.34% | +6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -6.04% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -6.92% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.60% | -0.39% |
Volatility
EAOA vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) is 5.24%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that EAOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EAOA | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 6.11% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 9.65% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 18.38% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 17.04% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 18.38% | -5.21% |