PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOA vs. NTSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EAOA vs. NTSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EAOA vs. NTSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
-1.25%18.41%13.79%18.27%-17.76%6.54%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
5.87%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than NTSE's 5.87% return.


EAOA

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
-1.25%
6M
0.95%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*

NTSE

1D
0.27%
1M
-8.42%
YTD
5.87%
6M
10.53%
1Y
37.29%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAOA vs. NTSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EAOA vs. NTSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOA vs. NTSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOANTSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.84

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

2.48

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.64

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.18

10.21

-2.03

EAOA vs. NTSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOA Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the NTSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOA and NTSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOANTSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.84

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.15

+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between EAOA and NTSE is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EAOA vs. NTSE - Dividend Comparison

EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than NTSE's 3.13% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.12%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
3.13%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%0.00%

Drawdowns

EAOA vs. NTSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum NTSE drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and NTSE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOANTSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-42.84%

+17.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-14.20%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-10.58%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-20.34%

+14.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.66%

-1.45%

Volatility

EAOA vs. NTSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) is 5.24%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a volatility of 9.82%. This indicates that EAOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EAOANTSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

9.82%

-4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

15.30%

-6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

20.34%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

18.75%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.17%

18.75%

-5.58%