EAOA vs. AVMA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) and AVMA (Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOA is passively managed, while AVMA is actively managed. Over the past year, EAOA returned 24.37% vs 23.97% for AVMA. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EAOA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for AVMA.

Performance

EAOA vs. AVMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than AVMA's 10.43% return.

EAOA

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

AVMA

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 23.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOA vs. AVMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	9.93%	18.41%	13.79%	7.26%
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	10.43%	16.72%	10.01%	8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOA and AVMA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.95

The correlation between EAOA and AVMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOA vs. AVMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAOA	AVMA
Technology	28.9%	19.2%
Financial Services	13.5%	18.0%
Industrials	9.0%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	12.0%
Communication Services	7.3%	6.9%
Healthcare	6.8%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	4.8%
Energy	3.0%	8.9%
Basic Materials	2.4%	5.3%
Utilities	2.3%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.6%	3.3%

Return for Risk

EAOA vs. AVMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOA

EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

AVMA

AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 80
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOA vs. AVMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOA	AVMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.68	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.84	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.50	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.76	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	15.96	-2.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAOA vs. AVMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the AVMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOA and AVMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOA	AVMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.68	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	1.54	-0.61

Drawdowns

EAOA vs. AVMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, which is greater than AVMA's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and AVMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOA	AVMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.06%	-11.81%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-6.40%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.44%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	-1.55%	-3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	1.51%	+0.33%

Volatility

EAOA vs. AVMA - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) at 2.63%. This indicates that EAOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAOA	AVMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	2.63%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	7.08%	+1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	8.99%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	10.29%	+2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	10.29%	+2.85%

EAOA vs. AVMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AVMA's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EAOA vs. AVMA - Dividend Comparison

EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than AVMA's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	2.34%	2.21%	2.28%	1.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	1.95%	2.10%	2.09%	2.21%	1.93%	1.48%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAOA and AVMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, EAOA and AVMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EAOA or AVMA?

EAOA has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to AVMA (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs AVMA's -11.81%.

Which ETF is better, EAOA or AVMA?

On 1-year performance, EAOA leads with 24.37% vs 23.97% for AVMA. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AVMA has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAOA or AVMA?

Over the 1-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 24.37% return vs 23.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAOA or AVMA?

EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for AVMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAOA or AVMA?

AVMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.

What is the main difference between EAOA and AVMA?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOA and 0.21% for AVMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.