EAOA vs. ASET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index while ASET tracks the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. Both are passively managed. EAOA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.

Performance

EAOA vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EAOA

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOA vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	6.86%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%

EAOA vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAOA	ASET
Technology	28.9%	0.2%
Financial Services	13.5%	-
Industrials	9.0%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	0.1%
Communication Services	7.3%	12.1%
Healthcare	6.8%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	1.1%
Energy	3.0%	7.8%
Basic Materials	2.4%	5.8%
Utilities	2.3%	12.8%
Real Estate	1.6%	41.6%

Return for Risk

EAOA vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOA

EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOA vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOA	ASET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOA	ASET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	—	—

Drawdowns

EAOA vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and ASET.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOA	ASET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.06%	0.00%	-25.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	0.00%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	0.00%	-5.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EAOA	ASET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	0.00%	+10.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	0.00%	+13.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	0.00%	+13.14%

EAOA vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAOA vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	1.95%	2.10%	2.09%	2.21%	1.93%	1.48%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, EAOA or ASET?

On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAOA or ASET?

EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAOA or ASET?

EAOA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between EAOA and ASET?

EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index, while ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOA and 0.57% for ASET.