EACPX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
EACPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
EACPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EACPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund | -14.19% | 9.13% | 21.92% | 41.77% | -29.56% | 18.48% | 33.61% | 31.91% | -0.04% | 25.78% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EACPX achieves a -14.19% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EACPX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 12.12%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
EACPX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -8.85%
- YTD
- -14.19%
- 6M
- -13.11%
- 1Y
- 1.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EACPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EACPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EACPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
EACPX
FASGX
EACPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EACPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 1.21 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.29 | 1.73 | -1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.26 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 1.55 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 6.89 | -7.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EACPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 1.21 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.53 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.70 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.60 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between EACPX and FASGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EACPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
EACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund | 9.69% | 8.31% | 4.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.17% | 3.14% | 2.22% | 2.39% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
EACPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EACPX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACPX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EACPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.39% | -47.35% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -9.07% | -7.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.70% | -23.54% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.70% | -27.20% | -6.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -7.95% | -8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -6.74% | -6.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 2.04% | +2.44% |
Volatility
EACPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that EACPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EACPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.57% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 7.78% | +2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 12.82% | +7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 12.14% | +8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 12.56% | +8.40% |