EACPX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EACPX (Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both mutual funds - EACPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FASGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, EACPX returned 13.93%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for FASGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EACPX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

EACPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EACPX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EACPX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 13.93%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.

EACPX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 3.62%
• 1Y: 14.48%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 13.93%

FASGX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 11.27%
• 6M: 12.13%
• 1Y: 25.26%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EACPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund	3.76%	9.13%	21.92%	41.77%	-29.56%	18.48%	33.61%	31.91%	-0.04%	25.78%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.27%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EACPX and FASGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2000	0.88

The correlation between EACPX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EACPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACPX

EACPX Risk / Return Rank: 13
EACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
EACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
EACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
EACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EACPX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	2.50	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	3.50	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.47	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	3.26	-2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.21	14.40	-11.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EACPX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EACPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EACPX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EACPX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	2.50	-1.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.67	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.79	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.63	-0.24

Drawdowns

EACPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EACPX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACPX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EACPX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.39%	-47.35%	-16.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.26%	-7.95%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.77%	-12.80%	-7.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.70%	-23.54%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.70%	-27.20%	-6.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-0.59%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.76%	-6.71%	-6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	1.79%	+2.89%

Volatility

EACPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EACPX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.37%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	8.40%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	10.35%	+3.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.46%	12.27%	+8.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.01%	12.65%	+8.36%

EACPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

EACPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

EACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than FASGX's 6.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund	8.01%	8.31%	4.43%	0.00%	0.00%	3.17%	3.14%	2.22%	2.39%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.59%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EACPX and FASGX in my portfolio?

EACPX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EACPX or FASGX?

EACPX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to FASGX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EACPX dropped -63.39% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.