EAAFX vs. VTMFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EAAFX (Allspring Asset Allocation Fund) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, EAAFX returned 8.25%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for VTMFX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EAAFX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.

Performance

EAAFX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Asset Allocation Fund (EAAFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAAFX achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 5.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EAAFX having a 8.25% annualized return and VTMFX not far ahead at 8.63%.

EAAFX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 9.72%
• 1Y: 21.60%
• 3Y*: 14.08%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

VTMFX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 15.82%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: 8.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAAFX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EAAFX Allspring Asset Allocation Fund	9.82%	15.11%	10.65%	14.32%	-16.00%	13.38%	13.57%	19.77%	-9.58%	14.80%
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares	5.44%	11.28%	12.17%	15.55%	-12.69%	13.10%	13.31%	18.01%	-1.40%	12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EAAFX and VTMFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1996	0.86

The correlation between EAAFX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EAAFX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAAFX

EAAFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
EAAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
EAAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EAAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
EAAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EAAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

VTMFX

VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 76
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAAFX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Asset Allocation Fund (EAAFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAAFX	VTMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.45	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	3.45	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	2.93	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.93	13.72	-1.80

EAAFX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAAFX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAAFX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAAFX drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAAFX and VTMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAAFX	VTMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.17%	-28.49%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	-5.38%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.94%	-10.61%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.36%	-17.40%	-4.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.55%	-21.87%	-3.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.56%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.60%	-3.54%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	1.15%	+0.63%

Volatility

EAAFX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Asset Allocation Fund (EAAFX) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.50%. This indicates that EAAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAAFX	VTMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	2.50%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.82%	5.21%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.84%	6.45%	+3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.13%	8.57%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.15%	9.15%	+2.00%

EAAFX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAAFX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAAFX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

EAAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than VTMFX's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAAFX Allspring Asset Allocation Fund	5.23%	5.74%	8.41%	0.00%	6.53%	15.18%	3.85%	1.51%	8.51%	1.70%	1.58%	4.52%
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares	2.12%	2.14%	2.08%	1.94%	1.85%	1.38%	1.72%	2.05%	2.22%	2.00%	2.13%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAAFX and VTMFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, EAAFX and VTMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EAAFX or VTMFX?

EAAFX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to VTMFX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAAFX dropped -34.17% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.