EAAFX vs. PUDZX
EAAFX (Allspring Asset Allocation Fund) and PUDZX (PGIM Real Assets Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, EAAFX returned 7.80%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for PUDZX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EAAFX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PUDZX.
Performance
EAAFX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAAFX achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EAAFX has outperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 7.80%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.65% annualized return.
EAAFX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 16.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.56%
PUDZX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 20.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EAAFX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAAFX Allspring Asset Allocation Fund | 7.55% | 15.11% | 10.65% | 14.32% | -16.00% | 13.38% | 13.57% | 19.77% | -9.58% | 14.80% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 12.51% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAAFX and PUDZX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EAAFX and PUDZX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAAFX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
EAAFX
PUDZX
EAAFX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Asset Allocation Fund (EAAFX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAAFX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.49 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 4.12 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.94 | 12.59 | -4.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAAFX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAAFX drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAAFX and PUDZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAAFX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | -21.53% | -12.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -5.01% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.94% | -8.20% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.36% | -17.98% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.55% | -21.53% | -4.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -2.57% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -5.24% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.64% | +0.33% |
Volatility
EAAFX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Asset Allocation Fund (EAAFX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 1.91%. This indicates that EAAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAAFX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 1.91% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 6.15% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 7.75% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 10.42% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 9.68% | +1.48% |
EAAFX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAAFX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAAFX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
EAAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, less than PUDZX's 8.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAAFX Allspring Asset Allocation Fund | 5.34% | 5.74% | 8.41% | 0.00% | 6.53% | 15.18% | 3.85% | 1.51% | 8.51% | 1.70% | 1.58% | 4.52% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.33% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAAFX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAAFX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to PUDZX (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAAFX dropped -34.17% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.
PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAAFX and PUDZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer