PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EA vs. UBSFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EA vs. UBSFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) and Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EA achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly higher than UBSFY's -20.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EA has outperformed UBSFY with an annualized return of 10.61%, while UBSFY has yielded a comparatively lower -16.96% annualized return.


EA

1D
0.38%
1M
1.00%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
0.17%
1Y
37.55%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
10.61%

UBSFY

1D
-2.95%
1M
4.55%
YTD
-20.69%
6M
-18.73%
1Y
-50.43%
3Y*
-41.82%
5Y*
-39.33%
10Y*
-16.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EA vs. UBSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.
-0.27%40.33%7.49%12.67%-6.84%-7.69%33.75%36.24%-24.89%33.39%
UBSFY
Ubisoft Entertainment ADR
-20.69%-46.30%-46.60%-10.03%-42.30%-49.40%39.69%-14.78%5.55%117.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EA and UBSFY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008

0.18

Fundamentals

EPS

EA:

$4.67

UBSFY:

-$2.50

PS Ratio

EA:

5.11

UBSFY:

0.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

EA:

$7.55B

UBSFY:

$3.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EA:

$5.94B

UBSFY:

$1.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

EA:

$1.42B

UBSFY:

-$881.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EA vs. UBSFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EA
EA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EA Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

UBSFY
UBSFY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UBSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
UBSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EA vs. UBSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) and Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAUBSFYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

0.87

+0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

-0.78

+5.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.87

-1.27

+17.14

EA vs. UBSFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EA Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the UBSFY Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EA and UBSFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAUBSFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

-0.79

+2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

-0.72

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

-0.37

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.17

+0.56

Drawdowns

EA vs. UBSFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EA drawdown since its inception was -84.24%, smaller than the maximum UBSFY drawdown of -96.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EA and UBSFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAUBSFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.24%

-96.58%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-64.60%

+57.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.54%

-87.60%

+57.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.54%

-94.28%

+63.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.83%

-96.58%

+46.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-95.27%

+94.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.23%

-46.27%

+20.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

39.83%

-37.46%

Volatility

EA vs. UBSFY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) is 1.04%, while Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) has a volatility of 20.27%. This indicates that EA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBSFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAUBSFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

20.27%

-19.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

55.79%

-51.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

64.23%

-42.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

54.66%

-30.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.72%

45.93%

-18.21%

Dividends

EA vs. UBSFY - Dividend Comparison

EA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while UBSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.
0.37%0.37%0.52%0.56%0.61%0.52%0.12%
UBSFY
Ubisoft Entertainment ADR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EA vs. UBSFY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Electronic Arts Inc. and Ubisoft Entertainment ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.12B
748.08M
(EA) Total Revenue
(UBSFY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EA and UBSFY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBSFY has higher volatility (20.27%) compared to EA (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EA dropped -84.24% vs UBSFY's -96.58%.

EA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EA and UBSFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer