EA vs. GAMR
EA (Electronic Arts Inc.) is a stock, while GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) is Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Over the past 10 years, EA returned 10.58%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for GAMR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EA vs. GAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EA achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than GAMR's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EA has underperformed GAMR with an annualized return of 10.58%, while GAMR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
EA
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 39.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 13.55%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
EA vs. GAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EA Electronic Arts Inc. | -0.64% | 40.33% | 7.49% | 12.67% | -6.84% | -7.69% | 33.75% | 36.24% | -24.89% | 33.39% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.68% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 14.76% | -18.82% | 59.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EA and GAMR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2016 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EA and GAMR has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EA vs. GAMR — Risk / Return Rank
EA
GAMR
EA vs. GAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EA | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.17 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 0.68 | +4.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.53 | 1.55 | +14.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EA | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 0.89 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | -0.02 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.53 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.58 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
EA vs. GAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EA drawdown since its inception was -84.24%, which is greater than GAMR's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EA and GAMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EA | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.24% | -55.37% | -28.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.46% | -29.36% | +21.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.54% | -29.36% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.54% | -50.57% | +20.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.83% | -55.37% | +5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -13.61% | +12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -22.13% | -4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 12.82% | -10.45% |
Volatility
EA vs. GAMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) is 0.99%, while Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that EA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EA | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 5.88% | -4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.26% | 17.37% | -13.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 22.32% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 24.35% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 24.27% | +3.46% |
Dividends
EA vs. GAMR - Dividend Comparison
EA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than GAMR's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EA Electronic Arts Inc. | 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.52% | 0.12% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EA and GAMR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAMR has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to EA (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EA dropped -84.24% vs GAMR's -55.37%.
EA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EA and GAMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer