PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBSFY vs. NTDOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UBSFY vs. NTDOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) and Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR (NTDOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBSFY achieves a -15.17% return, which is significantly higher than NTDOY's -28.05% return. Over the past 10 years, UBSFY has underperformed NTDOY with an annualized return of -17.38%, while NTDOY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.25% annualized return.


UBSFY

1D
-2.38%
1M
0.00%
6M
28.08%
YTD
-15.17%
1Y
-37.72%
3Y*
-41.79%
5Y*
-36.76%
10Y*
-17.38%
ALL TIME*
-7.62%

NTDOY

1D
2.62%
1M
9.43%
6M
-25.40%
YTD
-28.05%
1Y
-42.27%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
-0.76%
10Y*
9.25%
ALL TIME*
5.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.70M$58.18M$46.32M
$120.40K$181.11K$201.18K

UBSFY vs. NTDOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBSFY
Ubisoft Entertainment ADR
-15.17%-46.30%-46.60%-10.03%-42.30%-49.40%39.69%-14.78%5.55%117.49%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR
-28.05%16.19%13.11%24.66%-10.74%-27.51%61.36%50.76%-26.56%76.94%

Correlation

The correlation between UBSFY and NTDOY is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UBSFY:

$836.06M

NTDOY:

$55.80B

EPS

UBSFY:

-€2.50

NTDOY:

¥92.48

PS Ratio

UBSFY:

0.21

NTDOY:

3.76

PB Ratio

UBSFY:

0.48

NTDOY:

2.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

UBSFY:

€3.29B

NTDOY:

¥2.34T

Gross Profit (TTM)

UBSFY:

€1.32B

NTDOY:

¥921.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

UBSFY:

-€881.55M

NTDOY:

¥500.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBSFY vs. NTDOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBSFY
UBSFY Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
UBSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
UBSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

NTDOY
NTDOY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NTDOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTDOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTDOY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NTDOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTDOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBSFY vs. NTDOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) and Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR (NTDOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBSFYNTDOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.82

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.72

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

-1.11

+0.26

UBSFY vs. NTDOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is higher than the NTDOY Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBSFY and NTDOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBSFY vs. NTDOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBSFY drawdown since its inception was -96.58%, which is greater than NTDOY's maximum drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBSFY and NTDOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBSFYNTDOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.58%

-83.59%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.60%

-59.06%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.35%

-59.06%

-28.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.76%

-59.06%

-34.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.58%

-59.06%

-37.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.94%

-51.27%

-43.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.70%

-37.68%

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.21%

38.07%

+6.14%

Volatility

UBSFY vs. NTDOY - Volatility Comparison

Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) has a higher volatility of 22.04% compared to Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR (NTDOY) at 10.90%. This indicates that UBSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTDOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBSFYNTDOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.04%

10.90%

+11.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.77%

32.84%

+12.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.78%

40.71%

+26.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.63%

30.74%

+24.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.24%

33.50%

+12.74%

Dividends

UBSFY vs. NTDOY - Dividend Comparison

Neither UBSFY nor NTDOY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTDOY
Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR
0.00%0.87%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.56%1.23%
UBSFY
Ubisoft Entertainment ADR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UBSFY vs. NTDOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ubisoft Entertainment ADR and Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UBSFY and NTDOY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBSFY has higher volatility (22.04%) compared to NTDOY (10.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBSFY dropped -96.58% vs NTDOY's -83.59%.

UBSFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBSFY and NTDOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer