EA vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EA (Electronic Arts Inc.) is a stock, while MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Over the past 10 years, EA returned 11.15%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for MOAT. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EA vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EA achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EA has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 11.15%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.

EA

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.06%
• 1Y: 29.99%
• 3Y*: 18.34%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

MOAT

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: -1.37%
• 6M: -2.45%
• 1Y: 11.95%
• 3Y*: 10.75%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EA vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EA Electronic Arts Inc.	0.28%	40.33%	7.49%	12.67%	-6.84%	-7.69%	33.75%	36.24%	-24.89%	33.39%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-1.37%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EA and MOAT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between EA and MOAT has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

EA vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EA

EA Risk / Return Rank: 90
EA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EA Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EA Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 24
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EA vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EA	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	0.86	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	1.31	+1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.15	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.04	0.97	+3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.69	2.89	+9.79

EA vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EA Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EA and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EA vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EA drawdown since its inception was -84.24%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EA and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EA	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.24%	-33.31%	-50.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.46%	-12.43%	+4.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.54%	-21.44%	-9.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.54%	-23.96%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.83%	-33.31%	-16.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.14%	+5.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.19%	-3.83%	-22.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	4.14%	-1.77%

Volatility

EA vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) is 1.14%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that EA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EA	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	4.73%	-3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.35%	10.28%	-5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.92%	14.00%	+6.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	18.24%	+5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.68%	18.65%	+9.03%

Dividends

EA vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

EA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than MOAT's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EA Electronic Arts Inc.	0.37%	0.37%	0.52%	0.56%	0.61%	0.52%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.37%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EA and MOAT in my portfolio?

EA and MOAT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EA or MOAT?

MOAT has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to EA (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EA dropped -84.24% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.