PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBSFY vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBSFY vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBSFY achieves a -20.69% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, UBSFY has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of -16.96%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.


UBSFY

1D
-2.95%
1M
4.55%
YTD
-20.69%
6M
-18.73%
1Y
-50.43%
3Y*
-41.82%
5Y*
-39.33%
10Y*
-16.96%

MOAT

1D
0.88%
1M
3.57%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBSFY vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBSFY
Ubisoft Entertainment ADR
-20.69%-46.30%-46.60%-10.03%-42.30%-49.40%39.69%-14.78%5.55%117.49%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.07%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between UBSFY and MOAT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBSFY vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBSFY
UBSFY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UBSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
UBSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBSFY vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBSFYMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.19

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

1.25

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

3.90

-5.17

UBSFY vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBSFY and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBSFYMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

1.12

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.72

0.45

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.37

0.72

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.78

-0.95

Drawdowns

UBSFY vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBSFY drawdown since its inception was -96.58%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBSFY and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBSFYMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.58%

-33.31%

-63.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.60%

-12.43%

-52.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.60%

-21.44%

-66.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.28%

-23.96%

-70.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.58%

-33.31%

-63.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.27%

-3.88%

-91.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-3.83%

-42.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.83%

3.98%

+35.85%

Volatility

UBSFY vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) has a higher volatility of 20.27% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.86%. This indicates that UBSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBSFYMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.27%

3.86%

+16.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.79%

9.88%

+45.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.23%

13.85%

+50.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.66%

18.18%

+36.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.93%

18.68%

+27.25%

Dividends

UBSFY vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

UBSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
UBSFY
Ubisoft Entertainment ADR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBSFY and MOAT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBSFY has higher volatility (20.27%) compared to MOAT (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBSFY dropped -96.58% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBSFY and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer