UBSFY vs. MOAT

In the year-to-date period, UBSFY achieves a -16.30% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, UBSFY has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of -4.97%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.96% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UBSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBSFY and MOAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

UBSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.

The maximum UBSFY drawdown since its inception was -92.22%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBSFY and MOAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) has a higher volatility of 32.61% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 14.08%. This indicates that UBSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.