UBSFY vs. MOAT
UBSFY (Ubisoft Entertainment ADR) is a stock, while MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Over the past 10 years, UBSFY returned -16.96%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for MOAT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UBSFY vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBSFY achieves a -20.69% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, UBSFY has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of -16.96%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.
UBSFY
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- -20.69%
- 6M
- -18.73%
- 1Y
- -50.43%
- 3Y*
- -41.82%
- 5Y*
- -39.33%
- 10Y*
- -16.96%
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
UBSFY vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBSFY Ubisoft Entertainment ADR | -20.69% | -46.30% | -46.60% | -10.03% | -42.30% | -49.40% | 39.69% | -14.78% | 5.55% | 117.49% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.07% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBSFY and MOAT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBSFY vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
UBSFY
MOAT
UBSFY vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBSFY | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.19 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.25 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 3.90 | -5.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBSFY | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 1.12 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 | 0.45 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.37 | 0.72 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.78 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
UBSFY vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBSFY drawdown since its inception was -96.58%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBSFY and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBSFY | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.58% | -33.31% | -63.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.60% | -12.43% | -52.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.60% | -21.44% | -66.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.28% | -23.96% | -70.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.58% | -33.31% | -63.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.27% | -3.88% | -91.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.27% | -3.83% | -42.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.83% | 3.98% | +35.85% |
Volatility
UBSFY vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Ubisoft Entertainment ADR (UBSFY) has a higher volatility of 20.27% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.86%. This indicates that UBSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBSFY | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.27% | 3.86% | +16.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.79% | 9.88% | +45.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.23% | 13.85% | +50.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.66% | 18.18% | +36.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.93% | 18.68% | +27.25% |
Dividends
UBSFY vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
UBSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
UBSFY Ubisoft Entertainment ADR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBSFY and MOAT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UBSFY has higher volatility (20.27%) compared to MOAT (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBSFY dropped -96.58% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBSFY and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer