DZZ vs. AGQ
DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DZZ returned -10.94%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for AGQ. At a correlation of -0.67, they often move in opposite directions. DZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.
Performance
DZZ vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DZZ achieves a -50.78% return, which is significantly lower than AGQ's -29.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DZZ has underperformed AGQ with an annualized return of -10.94%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.
DZZ
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -19.92%
- YTD
- -50.78%
- 6M
- -42.90%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- -8.41%
- 5Y*
- -5.74%
- 10Y*
- -10.94%
AGQ
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -29.18%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 149.89%
- 3Y*
- 55.60%
- 5Y*
- 15.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
DZZ vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -50.78% | 132.78% | -35.06% | -8.14% | 2.79% | 0.56% | -37.13% | -26.64% | 8.21% | -21.81% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -29.18% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between DZZ and AGQ is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2008 | -0.67 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DZZ and AGQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.67 to -0.39, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DZZ vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
DZZ
AGQ
DZZ vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DZZ | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 1.98 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 3.75 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DZZ | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.25 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.18 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.08 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
DZZ vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, roughly equal to the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DZZ | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.64% | -98.16% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.84% | -76.21% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.84% | -76.21% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.84% | -76.21% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.84% | -76.25% | -4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.40% | -84.96% | -10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.30% | -79.86% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.43% | 40.19% | +13.24% |
Volatility
DZZ vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) is 30.48%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.59%. This indicates that DZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DZZ | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.48% | 33.59% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.82% | 133.69% | -73.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.50% | 120.79% | +48.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.65% | 74.68% | +8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.06% | 65.65% | -1.59% |
DZZ vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
DZZ vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither DZZ nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DZZ and AGQ have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (33.59%) compared to DZZ (30.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DZZ dropped -96.64% vs AGQ's -98.16%.
On 10-year performance, AGQ leads with 11.51% vs -10.94% for DZZ. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DZZ has been the lower-risk option at 30.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 11.51% return vs -10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.
DZZ and AGQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DZZ is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while AGQ is Silver. DZZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DZZ and 0.93% for AGQ.
AGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DZZ and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer