DYMIX vs. CLSE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DYMIX (Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional) and CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) are both funds - DYMIX is a Macro Trading fund actively managed by Dynamic Alpha Funds, while CLSE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DYMIX returned 29.27% vs 50.91% for CLSE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYMIX charges 1.98%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for CLSE.

Performance

DYMIX vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYMIX achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 25.76% return.

DYMIX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 29.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSE

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 25.76%
• 6M: 28.57%
• 1Y: 50.91%
• 3Y*: 32.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYMIX vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DYMIX Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional	8.05%	25.51%	18.38%	11.33%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	25.76%	20.44%	35.54%	3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DYMIX and CLSE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023	0.16

Return for Risk

DYMIX vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYMIX

DYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 36
DYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
DYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 95
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYMIX vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DYMIX	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	3.84	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	5.20	-2.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.67	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	10.55	-8.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.33	39.58	-34.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DYMIX vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYMIX and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DYMIX	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	3.84	-1.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	1.59	+0.14

Drawdowns

DYMIX vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum CLSE drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYMIX and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYMIX	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-16.45%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.95%	-4.85%	-8.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.95%	0.00%	-8.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-3.59%	-0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.59%	1.29%	+4.30%

Volatility

DYMIX vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional (DYMIX) is 2.82%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that DYMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYMIX	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	4.31%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	10.21%	+1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.32%	13.32%	+2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	13.88%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.43%	13.88%	+0.55%

DYMIX vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYMIX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYMIX vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

DYMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than CLSE's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.76%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%
DYMIX Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional	6.31%	6.82%	7.12%	0.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYMIX and CLSE in my portfolio?

DYMIX and CLSE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYMIX or CLSE?

CLSE has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to DYMIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYMIX dropped -12.95% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.