DYLG vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Global X - DYLG tracks the Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross while RYLD tracks the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DYLG returned 13.16%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for RYLD. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DYLG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

DYLG vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYLG achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 12.29% return.

DYLG

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 7.29%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 1Y: 20.19%
• 3Y*: 13.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.25%

RYLD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 10.16%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 24.93%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	$29.24K	$30.29K	$73.30K
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$10.07M	$9.36M	$9.08M

DYLG vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	8.59%	12.50%	14.46%	4.05%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	12.29%	5.65%	10.13%	-2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DYLG and RYLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023	0.71

The correlation between DYLG and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

DYLG vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DYLG	RYLD
Financial Services	26.7%	17.8%
Industrials	18.9%	14.1%
Technology	16.1%	14.5%
Healthcare	13.2%	20.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	9.2%
Communication Services	5.2%	2.2%
Basic Materials	3.9%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	2.6%
Energy	1.9%	5.5%
Real Estate	-	6.8%
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

DYLG vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DYLG

DYLG Risk / Return Rank: 79
DYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
DYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 90
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DYLG vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DYLG	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.17	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.05	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.45	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	3.67	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	15.02	-5.63

DYLG vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYLG and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DYLG vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYLG drawdown since its inception was -13.98%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLG and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYLG	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.98%	-41.53%	+27.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-6.29%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.98%	-19.05%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.37%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-8.65%	+6.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.54%	+0.49%

Volatility

DYLG vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.07%. This indicates that DYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYLG	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	2.07%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.91%	7.73%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.70%	10.67%	-0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.35%	13.97%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.35%	17.04%	-5.69%

DYLG vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYLG vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

DYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, less than RYLD's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	9.22%	9.63%	16.55%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.62%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYLG and RYLD in my portfolio?

DYLG and RYLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYLG or RYLD?

DYLG has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to RYLD (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYLG dropped -13.98% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, DYLG or RYLD?

On 3-year performance, DYLG leads with 13.16% vs 8.04% for RYLD. On fees, DYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYLG or RYLD?

Over the 3-year period, DYLG has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYLG or RYLD?

DYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYLG or RYLD?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 9.22% for DYLG.

What is the main difference between DYLG and RYLD?

DYLG tracks Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RYLD tracks CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DYLG and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.