DXUV vs. QVAL
DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) and QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DXUV returned 27.35% vs 29.65% for QVAL. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DXUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QVAL.
Performance
DXUV vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXUV achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly lower than QVAL's 14.68% return.
DXUV
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVAL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
DXUV vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 10.92% | 14.34% | 5.00% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 14.68% | 10.98% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXUV and QVAL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DXUV and QVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
DXUV vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXUV
QVAL
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
DXUV
QVAL
Financial Services
DXUV
QVAL
-
Industrials
DXUV
QVAL
Consumer Cyclical
DXUV
QVAL
Healthcare
DXUV
QVAL
Communication Services
DXUV
QVAL
Energy
DXUV
QVAL
Consumer Defensive
DXUV
QVAL
Basic Materials
DXUV
QVAL
Utilities
DXUV
QVAL
-
Real Estate
DXUV
QVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXUV vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank
DXUV
QVAL
DXUV vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXUV | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 4.93 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 13.98 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXUV | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.07 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.49 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
DXUV vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXUV drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, smaller than the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXUV and QVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXUV | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.08% | -51.49% | +30.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -6.04% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.78% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -7.80% | +4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.13% | -0.04% |
Volatility
DXUV vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) is 2.98%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that DXUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXUV | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 4.16% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 10.06% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 14.44% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 21.63% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 22.79% | -5.48% |
DXUV vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXUV vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison
DXUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than QVAL's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.01% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXUV and QVAL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to DXUV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXUV dropped -21.08% vs QVAL's -51.49%.
On 1-year performance, QVAL leads with 29.65% vs 27.35% for DXUV. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DXUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 29.65% return vs 27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.
QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.96% for DXUV.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DXUV and 0.28% for QVAL.
DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXUV and QVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer