DXLG vs. STRL
DXLG (Destination XL Group, Inc.) and STRL (Sterling Construction Company, Inc.) are both stocks. DXLG operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, DXLG returned -17.46%/yr vs 68.46%/yr for STRL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXLG vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXLG achieves a -25.80% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 212.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DXLG has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of -17.46%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 68.46% annualized return.
DXLG
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- -25.80%
- 6M
- -36.23%
- 1Y
- -33.76%
- 3Y*
- -46.32%
- 5Y*
- -27.93%
- 10Y*
- -17.46%
STRL
- 1D
- 9.31%
- 1M
- 80.75%
- YTD
- 212.52%
- 6M
- 195.87%
- 1Y
- 392.73%
- 3Y*
- 168.94%
- 5Y*
- 107.15%
- 10Y*
- 68.46%
DXLG vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXLG Destination XL Group, Inc. | -25.80% | -65.82% | -38.86% | -34.81% | 18.84% | 2,018.61% | -79.05% | -41.01% | -1.36% | -48.24% |
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 212.52% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXLG and STRL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995 | 0.17 |
The correlation between DXLG and STRL shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DXLG:
$37.29M
STRL:
$29.70B
DXLG:
-$0.66
STRL:
$11.19
DXLG:
0.08
STRL:
10.28
DXLG:
0.34
STRL:
24.97
DXLG:
$435.02M
STRL:
$2.88B
DXLG:
$188.99M
STRL:
$664.66M
DXLG:
-$2.02M
STRL:
$429.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXLG vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
DXLG
STRL
DXLG vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXLG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.62 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 12.76 | -13.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 35.75 | -36.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXLG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 4.92 | -5.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 1.90 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.21 | 1.29 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.27 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DXLG vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXLG drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXLG and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXLG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.18% | -92.51% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.12% | -31.02% | -41.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.59% | -47.67% | -43.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.02% | -47.67% | -47.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.29% | -59.60% | -36.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.27% | 0.00% | -97.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.17% | -46.32% | -31.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.33% | 11.05% | +32.28% |
Volatility
DXLG vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) is 18.23%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 47.76%. This indicates that DXLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXLG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.23% | 47.76% | -29.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.29% | 62.53% | +13.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.19% | 80.55% | +10.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.45% | 56.74% | +9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.85% | 53.30% | +29.55% |
Dividends
DXLG vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DXLG nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DXLG vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Destination XL Group, Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DXLG vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison
DXLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.69M and revenue of 112.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
DXLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -9.65M and revenue of 112.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.6%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
DXLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported a net income of -29.58M and revenue of 112.10M, resulting in a net margin of -26.4%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DXLG and STRL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (47.76%) compared to DXLG (18.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXLG dropped -99.18% vs STRL's -92.51%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXLG and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer