DXJ vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. DXJ is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, DXJ returned 54.41% vs 47.83% for GSIB. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXJ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

DXJ vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXJ achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than GSIB's 13.98% return.

DXJ

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 18.74%
• 6M: 19.84%
• 1Y: 54.41%
• 3Y*: 30.91%
• 5Y*: 26.01%
• 10Y*: 18.72%

GSIB

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 6.99%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXJ vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund	18.74%	32.78%	29.83%	2.17%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	13.98%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DXJ and GSIB is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.51

The correlation between DXJ and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

DXJ vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DXJ	GSIB
Industrials	27.4%	-
Financial Services	18.3%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	15.6%	-
Technology	12.9%	-
Basic Materials	8.5%	-
Healthcare	6.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Communication Services	2.7%	-
Energy	1.7%	-
Utilities	0.1%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

DXJ vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXJ

DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 92
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 81
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXJ vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DXJ	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	2.59	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	3.58	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.43	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.88	3.28	+1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.93	11.54	+7.39

DXJ vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXJ and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DXJ vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJ and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DXJ	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.63%	-17.71%	-31.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.98%	-13.90%	+2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	0.00%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.32%	-2.05%	-12.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	3.94%	-1.11%

Volatility

DXJ vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) is 4.64%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that DXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DXJ	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	5.59%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.56%	14.41%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.73%	17.63%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	18.51%	+0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.17%	18.51%	+1.66%

DXJ vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXJ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DXJ vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than GSIB's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund	1.09%	1.29%	3.48%	3.44%	3.02%	2.64%	2.53%	2.47%	2.92%	2.30%	1.98%	5.95%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.67%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DXJ and GSIB in my portfolio?

DXJ and GSIB have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DXJ or GSIB?

GSIB has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to DXJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXJ dropped -49.63% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, DXJ or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, DXJ leads with 54.41% vs 47.83% for GSIB. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DXJ or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 54.41% return vs 47.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DXJ or GSIB?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DXJ or GSIB?

GSIB has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.09% for DXJ.

What is the main difference between DXJ and GSIB?

DXJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJ and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.