DXCM vs. TFLO
DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) is a stock, while TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. Over the past 10 years, DXCM returned 14.84%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for TFLO. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
DXCM vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly higher than TFLO's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DXCM has outperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 14.84%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.
DXCM
- 1D
- 7.22%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 1Y
- -7.31%
- 3Y*
- -17.22%
- 5Y*
- -7.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
TFLO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
DXCM vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 17.49% | -14.66% | -37.33% | 9.58% | -15.64% | 45.23% | 69.02% | 82.59% | 108.75% | -3.87% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 2.04% | 4.22% | 5.34% | 5.12% | 1.99% | -0.02% | 0.43% | 2.04% | 1.76% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXCM and TFLO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXCM vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank
DXCM
TFLO
DXCM vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXCM | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -13.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -47.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 12.34 | -11.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 199.41 | -199.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 766.50 | -766.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXCM vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and TFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXCM | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.61% | -5.01% | -89.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.75% | -0.02% | -38.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.95% | -0.04% | -60.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -0.13% | -66.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.32% | -0.16% | -66.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.11% | 0.00% | -52.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.10% | -0.10% | -36.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.48% | 0.01% | +23.47% |
Volatility
DXCM vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison
DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.10%. This indicates that DXCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXCM | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.67% | 0.10% | +12.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.05% | 0.20% | +26.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.85% | 0.29% | +40.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.28% | 0.36% | +46.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.53% | 0.45% | +48.08% |
Dividends
DXCM vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison
DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.84% | 4.16% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXCM and TFLO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXCM has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to TFLO (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXCM dropped -94.61% vs TFLO's -5.01%.
TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.67 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXCM and TFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer